ModelSaid Free vs Monitor: which plan should you choose?

Choose ModelSaid Free when you want to test AI visibility for one business without committing to ongoing work. Choose Monitor when that business needs scheduled scans, alerts, trends, research and reporting. The dividing line is simple: Free answers "what does a teaser check show now?" while Monitor answers "what changed, why might it matter, and what should we do next?" Compare current commercial terms on pricing, because checkout prices come from Stripe and can change.

Free gives you a baseline, not monitoring

The Free plan includes the public checker and generators, one teaser AI visibility scan, and one business. There is no scheduled visibility rescan, technical monitoring, alerting, history, custom prompt portfolio, report workflow or integration entitlement. That is deliberate: Free lets a team see an example of the problem before building a recurring process. Run the free visibility scan when you are still deciding whether AI answers contain a meaningful discovery or accuracy gap.

Monitor is a recurring operating system for one brand

Monitor also covers one business, but its work repeats. It schedules an AI visibility scan every month and checks technical AI readiness weekly. Alerts surface changes that should be reviewed, and twelve months of retained trends create a comparable record. Two on-demand scans per month give an owner room to investigate an important launch or correction without waiting for the scheduled cycle. Those allowances are account entitlements, not a promise that generated answers will be identical on every run.

The working limits buyers should compare

• Businesses: one on Free and one on Monitor; neither is a multi-client workspace.
• Visibility cadence: none on Free, monthly on Monitor.
• Technical cadence: none on Free, weekly on Monitor.
• Custom intelligence: zero custom prompts on Free, ten enabled prompts on Monitor.
• Production support: zero content drafts on Free, ten drafts per month on Monitor.
• On-demand capacity: none on Free, two additional scans per month on Monitor.
• History and alerts: absent on Free; twelve-month trends and up to ten custom alert rules on Monitor.

Monitor adds context beyond a score

A score is useful for orientation, but subscription value comes from explaining movement and organizing a response. Monitor unlocks research, reporting and integrations, including one Google connection for GSC or GA4. This lets a marketer place AI answer observations beside owned search and analytics data without claiming they are the same metric. It also provides an AI Clarity report with prioritized findings and supports ten content drafts per month for turning defensible gaps into useful pages.

The plan choice does not make focused utilities obsolete. Use the llms.txt generator to create a clear machine-readable guide, or the schema generator to draft structured data that matches visible page facts. These tools address specific technical tasks. Monitor adds observation and continuity: it helps determine whether the business is mentioned, described accurately and compared with competitors over time.

Stay on Free if the organization has no owner for a monthly review, the teaser reveals no material business question yet, or the website is undergoing a near-term rebuild that would make a baseline short-lived. A free check can still guide immediate housekeeping. Save the result, define the customer questions that matter, and decide what event would justify monitoring. Upgrading without an operating owner only produces information nobody acts on.

When Monitor pays for itself operationally

Monitor fits when missed recommendations, recurring inaccuracies or changing competitor answers are worth detecting, and when someone can review one monthly scan plus technical alerts. It is particularly coherent for an in-house marketer responsible for one brand. If you need multiple included businesses, daily technical checks, team seats or white-label reports, compare Agency instead of stacking Monitor around an agency workflow. Start with evidence, estimate the review time, and choose the smallest plan that supports the actual process. Monitor does not guarantee placement in any assistant; it gives the business a disciplined way to measure and improve the evidence those systems can find across a provider set that can expand over time. A quarterly owner review should record which alerts led to action, which recommendations were rejected, and whether the original prompt set still represents customer demand. That small governance habit keeps the subscription tied to useful decisions instead of passive dashboard consumption.